By Bill Muehlenberg.
More Theological Revisionism
Homosexual activists both within and without the church are seeking to rewrite the Bible to push their agenda. They use many ploys to convince us that the Bible has no problem with homosexuality, and that traditional understandings are simply mistaken.
I have discussed some of these ploys elsewhere, but here I will address another one. This has to do with misunderstanding and misusing the purity and holiness laws found in the Old Testament. It is quite common for these revisionist to throw out the challenge that the laws forbidding homosexuality in the Old Testament also forbid things like eating animals which do not chew the cud, or fish without scales.
These critics who think they are quite clever argue,’ if it is now OK to eat all foods, why forbid homosexuality?’ As but one example, I recently received this comment: “Bill, it’s not just the homosexual Christians we should be worried about. What about the cray-fish eating Christians, or indeed the mixed-fabric wearing Christians. Both these ‘Christian’ types distort God’s holy directions as laid out in His bible. What do you suggest we do, Bill?”
Read more here.
Tuesday, 29 June 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(41)
-
▼
June
(25)
- New wine in old church buildings
- Crayfish, mixed cloth and homosexuality
- God, Google and the Gospel
- Ambition and a Future Target
- Ambition Without Risk?
- New religious freedom rhetoric within the Obama ad...
- A Review of The Rage Against God. By Peter Hitchens
- Teasing out the morality of coalition
- The courts of ‘Oh Canada’: From gay marriage to po...
- A good explanation of Conservative Evangelical con...
- Angry Anglicans
- Inventing homophobic bogeymen
- Did Jesus Preach Paul’s Gospel?
- The science of cake
- To Prosperity Preachers: Teach Them to Go
- Hurt Before Fruit
- Session 2 - Matt Chandler at the 300 Leaders Confe...
- None but Jesus
- Politics of Pentecost
- Archbishop of Canterbury's Pentecost letter to the...
- Rowan’s Pentecost letter in a nutshell
- Divorced bishops to be permitted for first time by...
- Sexually Indulgent Now, Marriage Ruined Later?
- I'm a spiritual person
- It is best to mark the death of a ‘child of God’ w...
-
▼
June
(25)
No comments:
Post a Comment