By Dave Harvey
A few years ago, I heard an interview with a Christian college professor. Having logged three decades in the classroom, he was asked to compare college students today with those of the past. Decades ago, he indicated, incoming freshmen arrived sporting some serious aspiration. If asked, they could (and would!) become the leaders, innovators, and agents of change for industry, government, and commerce. Their ideas would influence society and determine the course of civilization. Yep, humility was weak but ambition ran strong and deep.
But over time the professor detected a shift. Where postmodernism flourished, ambition went AWOL. Students grew ambivalent. Gone were the dreams for making an impact. In their place was the ethos of “Whatever!”—student-speak for, “believe in nothing, care for nothing, interfere with nothing, and live for nothing.”
The professor knew something vital had been By here.
Wednesday, 23 June 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(41)
-
▼
June
(25)
- New wine in old church buildings
- Crayfish, mixed cloth and homosexuality
- God, Google and the Gospel
- Ambition and a Future Target
- Ambition Without Risk?
- New religious freedom rhetoric within the Obama ad...
- A Review of The Rage Against God. By Peter Hitchens
- Teasing out the morality of coalition
- The courts of ‘Oh Canada’: From gay marriage to po...
- A good explanation of Conservative Evangelical con...
- Angry Anglicans
- Inventing homophobic bogeymen
- Did Jesus Preach Paul’s Gospel?
- The science of cake
- To Prosperity Preachers: Teach Them to Go
- Hurt Before Fruit
- Session 2 - Matt Chandler at the 300 Leaders Confe...
- None but Jesus
- Politics of Pentecost
- Archbishop of Canterbury's Pentecost letter to the...
- Rowan’s Pentecost letter in a nutshell
- Divorced bishops to be permitted for first time by...
- Sexually Indulgent Now, Marriage Ruined Later?
- I'm a spiritual person
- It is best to mark the death of a ‘child of God’ w...
-
▼
June
(25)
No comments:
Post a Comment