Friday, 23 November 2012
Measure of compromise
The media has depicted the Church of England as being on the verge of collapse because of the rejection of a General Synod Measure permitting the appointment of women as bishops. It was seen as a triumph of obscurantism over progress, a refusal to recognise the right of women to equal treatment with men. But there is more to it than that.
Strong feelings militate against compromise, but a willingness to compromise could have produced a better outcome. It still could, once tempers cool. No one’s interests are served by the Church of England inflicting damage on itself over this issue. Nor is it simply true to say that the Church has turned its back on women bishops. It has turned its back on one way of achieving them, because the proposed route did not go far enough towards safeguarding the rights of the opposing minority.
The rejected measure has had a long and tortuous history.
[Read the rest here]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(33)
-
▼
November
(15)
- Almost half the lay members who voted against fema...
- A "liberal" member of Synod explains his "no" vote...
- If the zealots truly cared about equality, they'd ...
- Measure of compromise
- Church Society Video about "The Women Bishops Meas...
- Mr Speaker 'guides' Labour MPs on Church of Englan...
- Fiona Gibson on the Women Bishops debate
- Conservative Evangelicals on the Rise in the Churc...
- Angus Macleay’s summing up speech in the women bis...
- Women Bishops: House of Laity says 'no' by 6 votes
- The Bishop of St Albans response to the women bish...
- The defeat of the Measure: preliminary reflections
- General Synod Rejects Draft Legislation on Women B...
- Forward in Faith reacts to the defeat of the draft...
- Statement from Chairman of Reform on Today’s Synod...
-
▼
November
(15)
No comments:
Post a Comment